December, 2012

Book Review: Shavetail

December 30th, 2012 11 Comments

The period between Christmas and the New Year is traditionally supposed to be a time of reflection, when we all look back at the things we’ve done, the various screw-ups we’ve committed, and resolve to do better. Since I might well die of old age before I could list all my screw-ups, I decided to simplify things and go straight to step two. I resolved to take reasoned and practical steps to boost my book sales. I decided to start by taking the advice of someone who was doing better than I.

 

I had a marketing brainstorming session with a successful self-published author of romance novels who told me, among many bits of excellent advice, that my blog should focus on certain key subjects designed to attract potential readers of my books. (She said it all much better than that; I’m just putting it in baby talk for purposes of simplification.) It is, actually, advice I’ve been given before, and it goes along with the advice given to me, both by my romance writer friend and others, to stick to a single genre with my books. Build up a reputation as a Western writer, or as a mystery writer, or—presumably—a romance writer, or whatever. It’s sound advice, and the proof is reflected in statistics of book sales by category.

 

So, just to show that I have absolutely no business savvy whatsoever—or practical commonsense, or the good sense to accept good advice, or even the strength of character to stick to my own resolutions—I intend to branch out even further. I’m going to start reviewing books that I especially like. I’m not going to try and mold myself into a critic. I won’t review books I don’t like because if I really don’t like a book I almost certainly won’t finish it, so why bother saying anything negative about something I haven’t bothered to read? But going on the premise that people who read this blog are almost certainly people who like to read, why not tell them which books have really excited me?

 

With that in mind, I’m going to start with Shavetail. I don’t remember how I stumbled across Thomas Cobb, but I wanted to see how he had handled something in one of his books, and I ordered With Blood in Their Eyes, his chilling and meticulously researched fictionalized account of the bloodiest and deadliest shootout in Arizona history. I’ll review With Blood in Their Eyes later, but for the nonce, suffice it to say I liked it so much I ordered his other two novels, Shavetail, and the one he is most famous for, Crazy Heart. That one I’m sure you’ve heard of because it was made into an Academy Award-winning movie with Jeff Bridges.

It’s a wonderful thing to discover a writer whose work is so compelling that you can’t wait to lay your hands on everything he’s ever done. That’s how good Thomas Cobb is. It’s like the first time you read anything by P.G. Wodehouse: you steal money from your mother’s purse and rush out to buy everything he ever wrote which, in the case of P. G. Wodehouse, means you have to steal quite a lot of money. Wodehouse was prolific and lived to be ninety-three, writing right up to the end. Thomas Cobb has only written the three novels, so I didn’t have to mug any of the local elementary school children to buy his books. I’ve already written a review for Amazon, so I’ll just copy it here:

 

Shavetail has been characterized as a Western, but to paraphrase the great Duke Ellington, there are only two kinds of books, the good kind and the other kind. Shavetail transcends the good kind to peak in the rarified air of great novels. This is a story of redemption and coming of age in a brutal world where all the romance and mythology of the West have been deconstructed into a reality as confused and uncertain and frequently terrifying as today’s news. Like The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance or Unforgiven, this novel takes place behind the façade of honor and courage and legend. Writing in exquisite prose, both lean and elegiac, Thomas Cobb gives us unforgettable characters, all of them running away from those things that can never be run away from. It takes place in some of the harshest land in the West, in 1871, and there are heroes and villains, cavalry and Apaches, horses and a girl, all the ingredients of the traditional Western, but in Cobb’s hands those things become mixed with the ambiguity of reality, so that nothing is what it seems. The line between good and evil is as blurred as it is life, where good intentions and bad intentions frequently have the same result: “If the United States can’t kill someone with a twelve-pound howitzer, they’ll throw money at him until he’s dead. It’s the way the government does business, and all that the government does is business. Look around at what’s here. What ain’t spoiled is what the government hasn’t had the time to spoil. And you know what we are? We’re the spoilers…”

It’s hard to say if the themes that parallel some of today’s issues were intentional or a subconscious choice by an author who grew up in the Vietnam era, but two things are beyond dispute: All of Cobb’s characters—his young hero, the well-intentioned men his young hero admires, the ill-intentioned man he fears but must work with, even characters who never actually appear in the story (I don’t want to give too much away)—are as real and far more unforgettable than any you have read about in a long time. They are so singular and so memorable that they achieve a kind of Dickensian, prototypical stature.

The other indisputable thing about Shavetail is that you will not be able to stop turning the pages. To quote the great character actor Pat Buttram, who became famous as Gene Autry’s sidekick in a very different kind of Western: “If you don’t like this, you don’t like chocolate cake.”

Share

An Irreverent Christmas Poem

December 25th, 2012 3 Comments

The Shivering Beggar, by Robert Graves

 

Near Clapham village, where fields began,

Saint Edward met a beggar man.

It was Christmas morning, the church bells tolled,

The old man trembled for the fierce cold.

 

Saint Edward cried, “It is monstrous sin

A beggar to lie in rags so thin!

An old gray-beard and the frost so keen:

I shall give him my fur-lined gaberdine.”
He stripped off his gaberdine of scarlet

And wrapped it round the aged varlet,

Who clutched at the folds with a muttered curse,

Quaking and chattering seven times worse.
Said Edward, “Sir, it would seem you freeze

Most bitter at your extremities.

Here are gloves and shoes and stockings also,

That warm upon your way you may go.”
The man took stocking and shoe and glove,

Blaspheming Christ our Saviour’s love,

Yet seemed to find but little relief,

Shaking and shivering like a leaf.
Said the saint again, “I have no great riches,

Yet take this tunic, take these breeches,

My shirt and my vest, take everything,

And give due thanks to Jesus the King.”
The saint stood naked upon the snow

Long miles from where he was lodged at Bowe,

Praying, “O God! my faith, it grows faint!

This would try the temper of any saint.
“Make clean my heart, Almighty, I pray,

And drive these sinful thoughts away.

Make clean my heart if it be Thy will,

This damned old rascal’s shivering still!”
He stooped, he touched the beggar man’s shoulder;

He asked him did the frost nip colder?

“Frost!” said the beggar, “no, stupid lad!

’Tis the palsy makes me shiver so bad.”

Share

Talking About Depression

December 22nd, 2012 17 Comments

I have been in internet hell for reasons I cannot even begin to comprehend, let alone explain. Apparently there was some glitch that had nothing to do with me or my computer, but it effectively prevented me from checking my web site e-mails. It took my friend, the sublime genius at Cal Poly, to fix it, and I am now back in business.

 

Along with the usual job opportunities, notices of great wealth that would be mine as soon as I sent my Social Security number, bank account, and mother’s maiden name to an address in Nigeria, and offers of discount drugs I hope I never have to use, I received a very nice e-mail from a gentleman who discussed, among other things, the fact that he had bi-polar depression. I don’t suffer from or know much about bi-polar disorder (other than that some of our most creative geniuses have suffered from it) but I do know a little about depression. It runs in my family, proving that there is, apparently, a genetic component to just about everything from hair color to cancer, and it is also a corollary of post traumatic stress disorder, which I also have.

 

What impressed me most about this man’s email—apart from the fact that it was clearly written by someone intelligent and educated—was that he discussed his bi-polar depression at all. I was raised in a family where any kind of illness was supposed to be grandly ignored. If you snubbed it, it would, like an ill-mannered guest, slink away and leave you alone. That was for physical illnesses. Anything that fell under the bailiwick of the mental or emotional was even more grandly ignored. It simply wasn’t discussed, and I even have a dim memory of my mother once dismissing psychiatry as a fraud. It was an odd belief, if she truly believed that (she was very prone to hyperbole for dramatic or comic effect), because she suffered from depression, her father had really suffered from it, and one of her uncles had such a tenuous grasp on reality that he ended his days in the elegant and distinguished Baltimorean institution of Sheppard-Pratt, now known as a “behavioral health provider,” but known in those coarser days as a loony bin.

 

But if there is one thing I do know from my own experience, it is that the enemy of health—of mental health in particular—is silence. There are so many therapies and treatments and medicines available now, and so much more knowledge than in my unfortunate great-uncle’s day, that there is no reason for anyone to have to suffer from or be discriminated against because of mental health issues. The proviso, of course, is that one is able to talk openly and freely about it, without stigma. The young soldiers coming back with PTSD, and the frankness of geniuses like Francis Ford Coppola, and the authors who have written about their own troubles such as William Manchester (Goodbye Darkness), William Styron (Darkness Visible), Susanna Kayson (Girl, Interrupted) and so many others, have all contributed to a much more open attitude to mental issues.

 

Now, in the wake of the appalling tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, mental illness is being discussed on every news and talk show. Unfortunately, I fear people are making little distinction between the kind of mental illness that leads to evil, and the kind of mental illness that leads people to judge themselves with unrealistic harshness, or the kind of mental illness that can be easily ameliorated with drugs, just as they are making little distinction between firearms in evil hands and millions of the same firearms in law-abiding hands. There is also some, though not as much, talk about movies and video games that glorify violence, particularly violence with firearms.

 

No one has or ever will have any practical solution to evil. It exists, just as good exists. But any action on the three issues being discussed and blamed, to one extent or another, for the tragedy that occurred, will have consequences on America’s legal system, and more importantly on our Constitution.

 

Practically everyone is howling for some kind of gun control, but that will have an impact on the second amendment. A much smaller group are calling for restrictions on the kind of violent games and movies Hollywood relies on to fill its coffers, but that will—and must, by definition—require that the first amendment be modified. And then there is the issue of mental illness.

 

There is no right to privacy in the Constitution (anything not specifically spelled out in the Constitution as something the government may do is intended to be something it may not do, an aspect of the Constitution the current administration, like some others before it, has chosen to ignore) but the amendment that probably comes closest to touching on the privacy issue is the fourth. It too would need to be modified to allow private medical records to be shared with law enforcement.

 

One of the newspapers recently ran an op-ed piece talking about the second amendment and advocating that the Constitution should be regarded as something flexible, something that should be changed and modified over time to reflect the changing needs of a constantly evolving society. I cannot conceive of anything more moronic. The Constitution upholds and affirms God-given rights and freedoms, and those things do not change. Freedom, the right to defend yourself, the right to express yourself, the right to privacy, all those are things that were in the best interest of mankind two thousand years ago, and will still be in the best interest of mankind two thousand years from now.

 

So how do we prevent another horrifying tragedy? I don’t think we can. The Bath, Michigan school murders of 1927 have been forgotten today, but they far surpassed anything we have seen in our time, even Virginia Tech. Evil existed then, exists now, and will, sadly, always exist, and I for one do not believe your rights or mine should be curtailed in a futile effort to chase something that cannot be. As Ben Franklin put it, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

 

On the other hand, it is very good and desirable that we are talking openly and frankly about these things. Without the Constitution we might not have that liberty.

Share

On A Good Dog

December 16th, 2012 10 Comments

Steve Bodio (Stephen Bodio’s Querencia, in my links) lost a dog recently, and sent me this poem by, surprisingly enough, Ogden Nash.

On a Good Dog

O, my little pup ten years ago

was arrogant and spry,

Her backbone was a bended bow

for arrows in her eye.

Her step was proud, her bark was loud,

her nose was in the sky,

But she was ten years younger then,

And so, by God, was I.

Small birds on stilts along the beach

rose up with piping cry.

And as they rose beyond her reach

I thought to see her fly.

If natural law refused her wings,

that law she would defy,

for she could do unheard-of things,

and so, at times, could I.

Ten years ago she split the air

to seize what she could spy;

Tonight she bumps against a chair,

betrayed by milky eye! She seems to pant, Time up, time up!

My little dog must die,

And lie in dust with Hector’s pup;

So, presently, must I.

Share

Family Mythology

December 13th, 2012 16 Comments

I found a copy of Donna Tartt’s The Little Friend in my local bookstore and snapped it up. I’ve never read her first novel, The Secret History, that was so successful and critically acclaimed, but I have been an admirer of hers ever since I stumbled across an early short story called Tam-O’-Shanter in The New Yorker, while sitting in a doctor’s office many years ago. I was so impressed by the story that I stole the magazine, photo-copied the story, and sent it out to just about everyone I know who is capable of reading. That probably involves the breaking of multiple federal, state, and international copyright laws, but the story was worth it. It’s extraordinary. If I weren’t afraid of her lawyers showing up at my door with brass knuckles and cease-and-desist orders, I would post it here.

 

The Little Friend opens with a wonderful description of how family history morphs into family mythology, a theme that is repeated as the story progresses. I do much of my reading during bouts of insomnia, and last night, after I got so tired my eyes couldn’t decipher the hieroglyphics on the page any more, I drifted off into a memory of my own family mythology.

 

My father was in the Foreign Service, and during the years he was stationed in Europe my parents used to take my sister and me on long driving trips through different countries to historic cities, walled towns, glorious cathedrals, museums, and decaying medieval castles. (My parents had a genius for finding little-known out-of-the-way gems where one or the other of them would say wistfully, “Maybe if we drop a $10.00 bill on the doorstep they’ll sell the place to us,” and I would go off into fantasies of living in the Middle Ages.) On a civil servant’s salary there was very little money so we usually stayed jammed together in cheap little inns and picnicked by day regardless of the weather.

One spring we went to Austria where we spent a night in the medieval town of Kitzbühel, mercifully unscathed by two World Wars. It is a very posh ski resort in the winter, and an equally posh tourist destination in the summer, but during the awkward spring off-season prices are slashed and we were able to stay in a very elegant hotel where we were practically the only guests. The only other American was a woman we saw in the dining room but never spoke to.

 

As we were leaving, my father noticed a very fancy woman’s bicycle outside and he and I ambled over to look at it. It had a little plaque stating that it had been custom built for Mrs. Ruth Johnson of such and such an address in Grosse Point, Michigan. The lady in the dining room. As a former newspaperman, my father always carried a little notebook and pen and now, almost by force of habit, he made a note of the information.

We returned home from that jaunt to find one of those postcards everyone used to get back in the days before email and text messages, clearly written by someone who knew my parents well, and who was simply staying in touch in a cheery, chatty manner, but with an absolutely illegible signature at the bottom. I was aware of all this because—in their desperation—my parents enlisted both my sister and me in their efforts to figure out who the hell sent the damn thing.

This meaningless little incident set in motion a chain of events that culminated in a family mythology that endured—for me at least—almost half a century.

I forget now which one of them had the initial idea (they both had wicked senses of humor) but it was tailored along these lines: Most people’s lives are much too placid and mundane, so what might happen if you knew some things—personal, family things—about someone who didn’t know you at all? Just think how exciting you could make that person’s life!

And so began the great “un-rest cure,” for that was how my parents thought of it (taking their cue from the short story writer H. H. Munro). For the next three or four years Mr. and Mrs. Johnson of Grosse Point, Michigan were bombarded with cheery postcards and Christmas cards from all over the world, wishing them well, making references to things and people and places they knew—for my father did his homework—all of them signed with an absolutely unintelligible squiggle and no return address.

The first postcard, naturally enough, said something about how sorry they were to have missed Ruth in Kitzbühel, they hoped the snow that was still around hadn’t spoiled her bike trip, etc., etc. This was followed by a few more generic cards, and then my father started doing his research. It turned out that Mr. Johnson was a vice-president of the Ford Motor Company and had actually been in my father’s class at Harvard Law School, so references were made to class reunions, inquiries after their children, fervent hopes that they might get together, gradually evolving, over time, into plaintiff chiding that they never wrote back. And on and on.

My fiendish father even got friends of his who were traveling to exotic and disparate locations around the globe to carry cards with them and mail them locally from places like Conakry and Omsk and Cochabamba. (“Wish you could have joined us here…”) And every now and then, at the dinner table, one or the other of my parents would start the ball rolling with something like:

“Do you suppose they wake up in the night thinking, ‘Who is it? Where did I meet this person? What’s his name?’”

“Oh, maybe they’re divorced by now. The stress was just too great.”

“Or they could both be in Sheppard-Pratt, in adjoining padded cells, plucking at their lips and sticking straws in their hair.”

And off they’d go to compose yet another card.

This all ended abruptly one day when a card arrived in the mail, addressed to my father, and signed, clearly and legibly, “Ruth Johnson.” It wasn’t from her, of course. It was some friend of my father’s who had an equally wicked sense of humor, but Daddy, visions of his career ending in a shambles of headlines and lawsuits, called it off.

So, Mr. and Mrs. Johnson of Grosse Pointe, Michigan, if you, or more likely your children or grandchildren, should ever read this, have compassion and, I hope, a sense of humor. My parents were eccentric, imaginative people with a love of life and a sense of the absurd. There was no malice in either of them.

But remember, all this took place in Germany during the height of the Cold War. The pre-unification capitol of Bonn in the fifties and sixties was a hotbed of intrigue and spying and counter-spying and surveillance. German workers in the American community were regularly rounded up and deported to East Germany; apartments were scanned for bugs and if none were found it was just assumed they had been missed; phones were tapped, offices searched, and mail was read. There is a reason why so many of John le Carré’s novels are set in Germany. There is a reason why so many of them take place at least partially in Bonn.

One of the routine ways of passing confidential information was by encrypted letter or postcard, where a casual reference to a place or a date might be a reference to the passage of top-secret information, or a meeting, or an assassination. And here were my completely unworldly parents having a high old time mailing off frightfully casual cards, even having cards mailed from other countries, all of them with references to all kinds of places and dates and events that might or might not actually have occurred. You can imagine what the unimaginative, but highly suspicious, bureaucratic mind made of all this.

And you can also imagine what I made of it. I became so convinced that my father had, in fact, had something to do with the CIA that almost a half century later, egged on by my almost-as-gullible sister, I contacted the CIA using the Freedom of Information Act, and…

And was very disappointed to find out my father had nothing at all to do with covert operations. In my own defense, I must add that my conviction was not entirely unjustified. There really was an incident in the early fifties in Washington, DC, that involved my father, a Russian spy, Francis Gary Powers and his U2 spy plane, Allen Dulles, the FBI, wiretapping, and a dog, all of which actually happened, and all of which also entered the log of family history/mythology.

Share

She Who Must Be Obeyed

December 9th, 2012 19 Comments

I’ve been exploring ways to market my books, an endeavor that makes writing them look like child’s play. The only good news I could come up with is that apparently every other self-published author feels exactly the same way: the time and effort spent to create something one is proud of become dwarfed by the time and effort needed to let people know one has something out there in the marketplace.

 

Back when I wrote An Accidental Cowboy (on a typewriter, if anyone remembers what those were), marketing meant my publisher lined up a few readings-cum-book-signings and some interviews. Each of those represented a day out of my life with very little to show for it in terms of sales, so the amount of time and effort (not to mention money spent on travel) would have been overwhelming if my publisher had decided to spend big bucks promoting the book. With that in mind, I have to admit using the internet for self-promotion for self-published books is an improvement, but…

 

But that presupposes the happy author has some basic familiarity with the computer (She Who Must Be Obeyed) and with She Who Must Be Obeyed’s evil handmaiden, the Internet. I do not. I tremble in fear before my computer, and the internet appears to have a speech impediment that only allows it to use acronyms. The Evil Handmaiden also delights in leading me into intricate mazes where I get hopelessly lost.

 

I decided to take advantage of some of Amazon’s tools for their authors. They have something they call “Author Central” which is supposedly designed to help authors market their work. But the Evil Handmaiden’s speech impediment makes it almost impossible to use. There is a way to link my blog to my Author Page. Okie dokie, that certainly seems like a sensible thing to do. How hard can it be, I thought to myself?

 

She Who Must Be Obeyed and the Evil Handmaiden laughed so hard they had to support each other. Then SWMBO wiped the tears from her eyes and cracked her whip and EH informed me I had to have an RSS feed. Huh? I emailed my computer guru, a superhero born of a cross between Einstein and Merlin, and he informed me that RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication. Oh, yeah? Really simple for whom? And why couldn’t EH simply have said that without an acronym designed to make me feel even more computer illiterate than I already do?

 

Think of all the damned acronyms you have to deal with every time you crawl, cowering, up to the keyboard. From ACL (which I thought was something in my knee that doesn’t work anymore, but turns out to mean access control list) to BLOB (binary large object, whatever the hell that is) to FLOPS (floating point operations per second) to GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) to MIPS (million instructions per second, which is just about how overwhelmed I feel) to PROM (not a dance you’ll enjoy going to, it means programmable read only memory) to SMART (oh, shut up; it means self-monitoring and analysis reporting technology) to TWAIN (Mark is turning in his grave, but it means toolkit without an informative name) to XML (not one of the classic Jaguars, but rather extensible markup language.)

 

I’ve decided to fight back against SWMBO and EH with my own acronym: FU.

Share

Diversity

December 3rd, 2012 6 Comments

I posted a blog a while back in response to someone’s criticism of me for making my living, in part, by testing firearms. In retrospect, that was only a half-honest response, because in the same batch of emails was one from a person who expressed interest in reading some of my gun writing. At the time, I sort of dismissed the writer of that second email as just another loosely hinged right-wing extremist loony in a tinfoil hat, just like me, but then I got another request to read what I had to say about guns. So, with that in mind…

 

Astute and observant visitors to this web site will already have noticed that the “Short Stories” tab has been changed to the “Other Writings” tab. Since profiles of my erstwhile co-star Gerald McRaney or bullfighter Rob Smets, or—for that matter—a profile of a firearm, hardly qualify as short stories, I felt it better to expand the meaning and possibilities of the title.

 

I’ll start with something out of the ordinary.

 

 

Cowboss

 

In cattle country you learn that it is not unusual for a cowboy to drive—or ride a horse—many miles out of his way to talk to you face-to-face rather than use the telephone, so I wasn’t surprised to see a beat-up truck with an even more dilapidated stock trailer drive up the lane toward my house. It was late evening, all coral and turquoise, the last day of quail season. Normally, I would still have been out somewhere with my goofy Pudelpointer, but I had just had my shoulder rebuilt and couldn’t lift a shotgun, and my old dog was so arthritic that he was almost as useless as his owner, so I was at my desk, trying to make the best of a bad situation.

I didn’t recognize the truck or trailer. When they stopped in front of the house I could see two horses silhouetted, one still saddled, both drooping with exhaustion. When the driver got out all I could really identify was a mountain of man, but that only narrowed it down to half a dozen possibilities. He had a gun case in one hand.

What happened next is absolutely true, but I have changed all names, all identifying characteristics, numbers, provenances, everything that might give away the cowboy’s identity. This is at his request, and I don’t question his motives.

I shall call him Joe. I’ve known him for several years and I once almost bought a horse from him. He has a reputation in our neck of the woods as being one of the best all-round cowboys there is: good horseman, good cattleman, good ranch manager, good steward of the land he is responsible for, honest, and bull-tough. You wouldn’t want to be rude to his wife or daughter.

He limped into the house. Like all cowboys, he has had his share of wrecks, but he looked even more crippled up than usual. He refused anything to drink, and chatted with my wife for a moment, and when I commented on his looking especially tired and busted-up he grinned.

“Yeah, we were gathering out on _________’s place and I knew it wouldn’t take too long so I brought my shotgun along, got a last limit of quail. I’m getting a little old and fat to be hauling my carcass up and down these hills without a horse under me. But that’s what I wanted to see you about. __________ said I should show you this gun, said you know a lot about guns.”

“Joe, I don’t know a lot about anything and the older I get the less I know about everything, but I’m happy to do whatever I can for you.”

We went into my office and he laid the case across the arms of a chair and sat in another.

He said, “Let me tell you first how I got this. Back when I was riding for the…” he named a ranch about two hours away “…there was this old boy owned a small piece of land that bordered the ranch. He was a retired college professor, no cowboy or anything like that, so when some cows busted through the fence one Sunday, I went over and got them out of his tomatoes, fixed the fence and all, and this old boy and I got to talking. Make a long story short, we kind of got to be pretty good friends. I did a couple favors for him over the years, went along and held his hand once or twice when he had to get his grandson out of jail, a few other things. And that’s how I come to have this. See, the professor’s son died a while back and the only kin the old boy had was the grandson and he’s about as worthless as man can be and still be breathing. Drugs and stealing and all like that. Well, the professor come down with some lung trouble and he knew he was on his way out, so he called me last year, said the damned grandson was going to get everything, but the professor didn’t want him to have this shotgun. Wanted me to have it, on account of our being friends and all. Said it had been made special for his daddy a long time back and was pretty valuable. And now _________ says he thinks it’s valuable, told me to come see you, find out what it’s worth.”

I have been down this road many times. Everyone who has ever found an old firearm in Grandma’s attic is convinced he has a priceless treasure. It may happen, but not to me or anyone I know. The owner of the local tire shop in my town went to a garage sale where an elderly gent was selling two rifles and a shotgun. The tire dealer only wanted one of the rifles, but the old boy wouldn’t sell them separately; it was all or nothing. I happened to drop by to get my tires rotated a week or so later and it turned out the shotgun was a Parker VH, not in the best condition, but probably worth about twice what the tire dealer had paid for all three guns. That’s the closest I’ve ever personally come to treasure in the attic, and I had no reason to believe this would be any different.

But the human animal is by nature an optimist. PBS has done very well capitalizing on that fact with their Antiques Roadshow. Joe heaved himself up and unzipped the canvas case.

The value of a thing is dependent on many factors, but the quality of a thing is much easier to recognize and quantify. It has nothing to do with personal choices. You may not wish to hang a Rembrandt in your living room, but unless your IQ is smaller than your hat size you’ll recognize the quality of one regardless of whether it’s in pristine condition or in need of major restoration.

What I saw lying in that old-fashioned canvas slip-case was pure unadulterated quality. It was a sidelock over-and-under with double triggers, and I’m not a particular fan of over-and-unders, preferring side-by-sides, but it made no difference. The lines, the proportions, the elegance of the thing were overwhelming. The damn gun had charisma.

I moved the case to my desk and turned on the table lamp. Somehow, unlikely as it may seem, I had a pretty good idea what I was going to see. The top barrel was engraved, “Boss & Co., 13 Dover Street, Piccadilly, London, England.”

In case there is anyone unfamiliar with Boss shotguns, let me say that most of the truly knowledgeable and wealthy gun collectors I have ever met consider Boss to be the ne plus ultra of shotguns. Throughout its long career (dating back to 1773 or 1812, depending on how you look at it) the company has never built anything other than a ‘best’ gun, and never compromised their quality. Or their prices: the company itself proudly quotes no less a gun enthusiast than King George VI, who wasn’t exactly strapped for cash, but when asked if he had ever thought about ordering a Boss, he replied, “A Boss gun! A Boss gun! Bloody beautiful, but too bloody expensive!”

On my desk lay a gun too good for a king.

In four decades of mooning over high-end guns I couldn’t possibly afford, it was one of only two or three Boss shotguns I have ever laid eyes upon, and the first over-and-under. It was also the first time I have ever held one, and I began to appreciate the mystic that makes them so desired.

In addition to their reputation for the ultimate in quality and high price, Boss are famous for their over-and-under design, which is slimmer and shallower than any other. They achieve this by machining bites into the barrel face, allowing the bolts in the breech to enter the bites, eliminating any need for underlumps. The result is a low profile that allows the gun to be fitted with a straight grip and splinter fore-end that aligns the shooter’s hands as perfectly as a side-by-side. That design was created by John Robertson, who became a partner in Boss in 1891 and who eventually became sole owner. Robertson also created a unique ejector, and a single trigger design that became the subject of a lawsuit between Boss and Purdey.

This particular gun had twenty-eight inch barrels, delicate rose-and-scroll engraving, two Robertson patent numbers (for the fastening bolt and the ejector; if it had had a single trigger there would, presumably, have been a third Robertson patent number), multiple proofing numbers, and a gold oval with the initials of the man for whom it was originally made. The serial number placed the date of manufacture after World War One and before the Great Depression. (It actually placed the gun to a specific year, but I’m not eager to have Joe appear on my doorstep in a bad mood.) The gun showed the kind and degree of wear consistent with hard use and good care.

And that was it. I did some research for Joe, gave him what information I could, and then he drove off with his tired horses and his piece of perfection. I’ve asked him to consider adopting me, but I don’t think that plan is working so well.

Share
Top of Page